History of Early Modern Science
Please set your timezone at https://www.chstm.org/user
Consortium Respectful Behavior Policy
Participants at Consortium activities will treat each other with respect and consideration to create a collegial, inclusive, and professional environment that is free from any form of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation.
Participants will avoid any inappropriate actions or statements based on individual characteristics such as age, race, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, nationality, political affiliation, ability status, educational background, or any other characteristic protected by law. Disruptive or harassing behavior of any kind will not be tolerated. Harassment includes but is not limited to inappropriate or intimidating behavior and language, unwelcome jokes or comments, unwanted touching or attention, offensive images, photography without permission, and stalking.
Participants may send reports or concerns about violations of this policy to email@example.com.
There are no currently scheduled upcoming events.
December 3, 2019
Our final meeting for the fall will cover "Part III: Excess" in Science in the Age of Baroque.
November 5, 2019
Our second meeting will cover "Part II: Vision" in Science in the Age of Baroque.
October 8, 2019
(Note Special Day) The group will being discussion of Science in the Age of the Baroque (Springer, 2012), edited by Ofer Gal and Raz Chen-Morris. The first set of readings will be Part I: Order.
April 6, 2018
Note New Time
Harun Küçük, Introduction and Chap. 3 of work-in-progress on Ottoman science.
Please note that we are changing the time for the April and May meetings from noon to 5 pm (Eastern).
March 9, 2018
Three (relatively) recent takes on questions central to the historiography of the scientific revolution:
Daniel Garber, "Why the Scientific Revolution Wasn't a Scientific Revolution, and Why it Matters" (2016)
Peter Dear, "Historiography of Not-So-Recent Science" (2012)
Robert Westman, short selection from The Copernican Question (2011)
February 2, 2018
We discussed a selection of articles from the June 2017 special issue of History of Science on Iberian science. Maria Portuondo, who wrote the introduction to this issue, joined us from Johns Hopkins. To keep the reading at manageable quantity, we picked articles that engage particularly with historiographical questions. Interested readers may want to check out the rest of this very interesting journal issue.
Click on the Downloads tab on this page for the pdfs of the articles.
María Portuondo. “Iberian Science: Reflections and Studies”
Juan Pimentel and José Pardo-Tomás. “And yet, we were modern. The Paradoxes of Iberian Science after the Grand Narratives”
John Slater and Maríaluz López-Terrada. “Being Beyond: The Black Legend and How We Got Over It”
Henrique Leitāo and Antonio Sánchez. “Too Much To Tell: Narrative Styles of the First Descriptions of the Natural World of the Indies.”
January 12, 2018
* Note Special Day
We discussed two papers by Richard Oosterhoff (University of Cambridge, Centre for Research in the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities [CRASSH]) on Renaissance practices of reading and advancing knowledge claims in mathematical and astronomical texts.
1) "A Book, a Pen, and the Sphere: Reading Sacrobosco in the Renaissance,"
History of Universities 28, no. 2 (2015): 1–54.
2) "Idiotae, Mathematics and Artisans: The Untutored Mind and the Discovery of
Nature in the Fabrist Circle," Intellectual History Review 24 (2014): 1–19.
November 17, 2017
Discussion of Matthew Crawford, The Andean Wonder Drug: Cinchona Bark and Imperial Science in the Spanish Atlantic, 1630-1800 (Chicago, 2016)
The author joined us. We focused on the Introduction, Chap. 1 and Chap. 4
Please find a pdf of these chapters under "Current Download"
October 13, 2017
Discussion of two recent articles in Isis:
J. Andrew Mendelsohn and Annemarie Kinzelbach, “Common Knowledge: Bodies, Evidence, and Expertise in Early Modern Germany,” Isis, June 2017:259-279.
Evan Ragland, “‘Making Trials’ in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Academic Medicine,” Isis, September 2017: 503-528.
May 5, 2017
POSTPONED Sophie Weeks, "The role of mechanics in Francis Bacon’s Great Instauration," from Zittel, Engel, Nanni, and Karafyllis, eds., Philosophies of Technology: Francis Bacon and His Contemporaries.
Megan Piorko is a postdoctoral fellow at the Science History Institute. She previously held a dissertation fellowship at the Consortium for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine. Her research is on 17th century alchemical texts, at the intersection of the history of science and book history. She also serves as the Communications Editor to the Society for the History of Alchemy and Chemistry.
Katherine Reinhart is the Consortium's 2019-2020 NEH Postdoctoral Fellow. She holds a Ph.D. in history of art from University of Cambridge. Her book project examines the epistemic and political functions of images in a pivotal early modern scientific institution – the Académie royale des sciences, the first scientific academy in France. It reveals how various types of visual material – from anatomical drawings to allegorical reliefs on coins – were an indispensible part of the Academy’s projects, as well as providing tangible evidence of the scientific ambitions of the French state.