The History of Anthropology Working Group is an outgrowth of the History of Anthropology Review. Originally called the History of Anthropology Newsletter, HAR has been a nerve center for the history of anthropology for over forty years. In 2014, our editorial collective brought the newsletter into the digital age, redesigning it as an open access website with new sections and features. Over the six years since HAR’s relaunch we’ve seen the field of history of anthropology expand beyond an earlier focus on classic texts and figures to incorporate global traditions of anthropology, approaches from Indigenous Studies, STS and the History of Science, museology, library and information science, and the politics of collecting and displaying cultures. The history of studying the world’s cultures, ways of life, and systems of knowledge is vitally important as a means to address current issues, where increasing global connections do not erase significant differences.

HAR’s editors sought a forum in which to discuss and develop the issues that drive the journal beyond what is there on the site. This Working Group is open to anyone who wants to reflect on the histories of anthropology—anthropologists, historians, interested others.

Building on last year’s series of discussions on anthropology’s historical entwinement with racial science, white supremacy, and anti-racist activism, our discussions this year (2021-22) will explore the significance of anthropology’s history to its current practice. We are inviting anthropologists to choose historical texts or moments in the history of the field which they have found useful, difficult, or inspirational for their own work. Among other topics we aim to question the difference between histories of anthropology approached from inside the discipline and from outside of it, and the different ways in which critical and archival research about anthropological precedent informs current inquiry. We warmly welcome anthropologists, historians, and any other interested parties to join the conversation.

Please set your timezone

Participants at Consortium activities will treat each other with respect and consideration to create a collegial, inclusive, and professional environment that is free from any form of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation.

Participants will avoid any inappropriate actions or statements based on individual characteristics such as age, race, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, nationality, political affiliation, ability status, educational background, or any other characteristic protected by law. Disruptive or harassing behavior of any kind will not be tolerated. Harassment includes but is not limited to inappropriate or intimidating behavior and language, unwelcome jokes or comments, unwanted touching or attention, offensive images, photography without permission, and stalking.

Participants may send reports or concerns about violations of this policy to conduct@chstm.org.

Upcoming Meetings

Wednesday, November 5, 2025, 12:00 - 1:30 pm EST


We are delighted that in Novembre we are discussing the draft paper "Confronting Development: Ethnocide and its International Revival after 1968" by Sebastián Gil-Riaño (University of Pennsylvania)

In this paper, I examine the work of anthropologists and human rights activists who revived the notion of ethnocide as a political and scientific category in the Americas from the late 1960s to 1980s. Concerned by the destruction of Indigenous cultures, these experts organized a series of symposia and conferences that produced various declarations that adopted the term “ethnocide” to condemn the forced integration of Indigenous peoples of the Americas and which began to reinterpret economic development as a form of genocide. For instance, in the 1981 UNESCO Declaration of San José (Costa Rica) experts defined ethnocide as the denial of an ethnic group’s “right to enjoy, develop and transmit its own culture and its own language, whether collectively or individually.” The 1981 Declaration also called on governments to counter “ethnocide” by implementing policies “guaranteeing ethnic groups the free enjoyment of their own cultures” and dubbed this process “ethnodevelopment”. I argue that this late twentieth century revival represents a significant shift in interpretations of violence toward Indigenous peoples in the Americas.

Commentators TBC                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

 

Wednesday, December 3, 2025, 12:00 - 1:30 pm EST

Caleb Shelburne (Harvard)

Wednesday, January 7, 2026, 12:00 - 1:30 pm EST

TBA

Wednesday, February 4, 2026, 12:00 - 1:30 pm EST

TBA

Wednesday, March 4, 2026, 12:00 - 1:30 pm EST

TBA

Wednesday, April 1, 2026, 12:00 - 1:30 pm EDT

TBA

Wednesday, May 6, 2026, 12:00 - 1:30 pm EDT

TBA

Past Meetings

Please use pass code 989255 to join the meeting
Session 1: "Anthropology and the universal liberal human"
 
In this first session, led by Rosanna Dent (NJIT), we will read pieces by Ryan Cecil Jobson and Sylvia Wynter that consider how anthropology is mired by problems of the (so-called) universal liberal human. Readings for this opening session are longer than we anticipate future sessions will be (normally we aim for ~50pp max). Given the length of Wynter's piece, we have provided Elisabeth Paquette's encyclopedia article for a guide to Wynter's work. PDFs of all readings (main and additional) are provided in the "Session 1 Readings."
 
Main readings:

  • Ryan Cecil Jobson, “The Case for Letting Anthropology Burn: Sociocultural Anthropology in 2019,” American Anthropologist 122, no. 2 (2020): 259–71, https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13398.
  • Sylvia Wynter, “Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation--An Argument,” CR: The New Centennial Review 3, no. 3 (2003): 257–337, https://doi.org/10/d2js45.

 
Additional readings:

  • Elisabeth Paquette, “Wynter and Decolonization,” in Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, ed. Michael A. Peters (Singapore: Springer, 2017), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_476-1.
  • Aisha M. Beliso-De Jesús and Jemima Pierre, “Special Section: Anthropology of White Supremacy (introduction),” American Anthropologist 122, no. 1 (2020): 65–75, https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13351.

Group Conveners

rdent

Rosanna Dent

Rosanna Dent is Lipton Lecturer (assistant professor) in the Department of History and Philosophy of Science at Cambridge, where she teaches courses on the history of science, medicine, and technology, with an emphasis on the global South. She is currently working on a book manuscript on the history of twentieth century research in A'uwe (Xavante, Indigenous) communities in Central Brazil. The book examines how a half-century of iterative interactions of scholars and community members have shaped knowledge production as well as the political and social realities of both subjects and scholars. 

 

Rob Hancock

.

 

JudithRHKaplan

Judy Kaplan

Judy Kaplan is a cultural and intellectual historian of the human sciences with a focus on nineteenth- and twentieth-century linguistic research. She has published widely on subjects from orientalism to sound studies and is currently working on a project that unravels histories of research on language universals. She was a NSF Fellow in Residence at the Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine and is currently a curatorial fellow at the Science History Institute in Philadelphia, PA.

 

Paula

Paula Lopez

Paula López Caballero is a historian and anthropologist working at the National University in Mexico. The transversal question of her research is to critically examine indigeneity as a historical variable where the State, knowledge production, and ethnographic mediation are deeply intertwined. Her current project examines the first long-term anthropological expeditions in Mexico by Mexican- and U.S.-based social scientists from 1940 to 1960, as a privileged site to document how the daily, routine and systematic encounter with native inhabitants during fieldwork implied new standards of scientific objectification and representation.

 

mcwatson

Matthew Watson

Matthew C. Watson is an associate professor of anthropology at Mount Holyoke College. As an anthropologist and historian of the social sciences, his published work includes wide-ranging journal articles and an experimental ethnography of Maya hieroglyphic decipherment, Afterlives of Affect: Science, Religion, and an Edgewalker’s Spirit (Duke UP, 2020). His current research centers the formation of modern Americanist cultural anthropology through large, collaborative fieldwork projects and field schools in southern Mexico. At present, he is writing a history of the Harvard Chiapas Project (1957-1980) that documents an array of mediating fieldwork techniques and technologies: off-road vehicles, aerial photography, paper technologies, and computerized data processing and storage. 

 

320 Members

You must be a member to view resources. Login or create an account